SIMPLIFY-2: Momelotinib vs Best Available Therapy in Ruxolitinib-Experienced Pts With Myelofibrosis

June 2-6, 2017; Chicago, Illinois
Results from this phase III study reveal comparable splenic response rate but improved symptomatic response and transfusion independence rates with momelotinib vs BAT.
Format: Microsoft PowerPoint (.ppt)
File Size: 949 KB
Released: June 9, 2017

Acknowledgements

Supported by educational grants by
AbbVie
Amgen
AstraZeneca
Celgene Corporation
Genentech
Halozyme Therapeutics
Incyte
Merck & Co., Inc.

Related Content

Experts highlight key studies presented at the 2022 EHA annual meeting in this commentary from Clinical Care Options (CCO)

Stéphane de Botton, MD Jesús F. San-Miguel, MD, PhD Alessandra Tedeschi, MD Released: June 20, 2022

Slides from Clinical Care Options (CCO) with key findings on BTK inhibitors in CLL and MCL from the 2022 ASCO, EHA, Pan Pacific, ESMO, and SOHO meetings

Released: June 17, 2022

Phase II trial shows high response rates and high 3-year EFS and OS rates with crenolanib plus 7+3 chemotherapy in newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated AML, presented at ASCO 2022 and reported by Clinical Care Options (CCO)

Released: June 17, 2022

Results from retrospective Pre-MEASURE study evaluating the prognostic value of NGS-MRD testing in patients with AML in first remission prior to allogeneic HCT, presented at ASCO 2022 and reported by Clinical Care Options (CCO)

Released: June 17, 2022

Leaving the CCO site

You are now leaving the CCO site. The new destination site may have different terms of use and privacy policy.

Continue

Cookie Settings