Welcome to the CCO Site

Thank you for your interest in CCO content. As a guest, please complete the following information fields. These data help ensure our continued delivery of impactful education. 

Become a member (or login)? Member benefits include accreditation certificates, downloadable slides, and decision support tools.

Submit

Adverse Events During ART and Implications for Treatment: Key Data From Summer 2021
  • CME
  • CE

Eric S. Daar, MD
Released: September 22, 2021

Tolerability With New Therapies

FLAIR Week 124: Long-Acting Cabotegravir Plus Rilpivirine for Treatment-Naive PWH

Beyond the metabolic effects we examined in the previous studies, other important AEs may emerge with new therapies. An important example of a novel therapy is the regimen with long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine recently approved in the United States.

Among the registrational trials that led to this approval was the open-label FLAIR study of treatment-naive PWH who first achieved stable viral suppression with DTG/abacavir/3TC and who were then randomly assigned to switch to the long-acting regimen vs remaining on the induction regimen.12 At IAS 2021, the investigators presented 124-week follow-up data from 283 participants who were originally randomized to the long-acting cabotegravir plus long-acting rilpivirine arm, and I’d like to review the safety data here.13

I will not go into details on the virologic efficacy at Week 124, but know that virologic suppression was maintained at high levels with this every-4-week regimen.

FLAIR: Week 124 Injection Site Reactions

For this long-acting injectable regimen, the AEs of greatest interest have been the injection site reactions. As shown, a substantial percentage of participants had grade 1/2 injection-site reactions at the first injection. The grade 2 events declined quickly after the first injection at baseline and 4 weeks. After this, grade 1 reactions continued at a relatively low and stable levels out to 124 weeks, occurring in approximately 20% of participants.

The table describes some of the details, including the total number of injections (>17,000) and injection site reaction events (3732).

Pain was the most common symptom, occurring in 18% of injections. However, more significant—perhaps more sustained—reactions such as nodules and induration occurred in fewer than 1% of injections.

The fact that these injection site reactions were reasonably well tolerated and accepted is reflected in the small percentage of study participants who withdrew because of these AEs (2%). This information is extremely important to share with our patients who are looking to start this new novel treatment strategy.

Leaving the CCO site

You are now leaving the CCO site. The new destination site may have different terms of use and privacy policy.

Continue